
A Major League
At age ninety, the Greenwich League of Women Voters is full of energy and
plans for the future
CYNTHIA COULSON - GREENWICH MAGAZINE OCTOBER 2011 ISSUE

PHOTOGRAPH BY ILONA LIEBERMAN
When the greenwich league of women voters holds an anniversary party later
this month at the Historical Society, it will celebrate ninety years of
educating voters and advocating for good government. It will also pay
tribute to the legions of members who have continued the work of those early
women who fought for the right to vote.
Cyndy Anderson, the League’s current president, is following in the
footsteps of the suffragettes as well as those of her mother. “My mother was
president of her local League in East Greenwich, Rhode Island, and I think
of the state League,” Cyndy says. “She wanted to make a difference. To a
certain degree, I honor my mother with my commitment to the League.”
Under Cyndy’s presidency, the Greenwich League is pursuing its traditional
role of voter education and political action on issues it has studied. It is
also sponsoring programs that inform the public about a range of local
concerns from water quality to affordable housing to leaf blowers, the topic
of a public meeting in June. “People are very passionate, pro and con, about
leaf blowers,” Cyndy says. “We thought we’d provide an educational forum
with some experts so people could decide for themselves.”
One of her goals as president is to correct misleading perceptions about the
League. “The terms ‘blue stocking’ and ‘blue rinse’ come to mind. We are
trying to show we have younger people, and even older people, who are vital
and interesting, who don’t just manage paperwork and arcane information but
deal with things that affect our lives.”
Another misperception, Cyndy adds, “is that we are a liberal fringe group.
But we are really just doing good work for good government in a nonpartisan
way.” As an example, she cites a study of the town’s ethics code that
prompted the town to revise its policy last December. “Ethics reform does
not have a liberal agenda,” she remarks. “It’s good for everyone.” The
revisions include a requirement that every town employee receive and read a
copy of the code, which did not exist before.
With close to 340 members, the Greenwich League is the largest in
Connecticut, and Cyndy intends to keep it that way. When she learned last
January that forty people hadn’t renewed their membership, she called each
one to ask why. “I said, ‘I don’t really care why’—although of course, I
did!— ‘but I’d just like to know if we could be doing things better.’ I got
twenty-seven of them to renew. That was a good use of my time.”
Over the years, many women, and even some men, have found engaging in League
activities a “good use” of their time. Three of those explain why.
Jara Burnett
Jara Burnett was born in the Czech Republic when it was a democracy but
spent much of her childhood under totalitarian rule. Nazi Germany invaded
the country in 1939, occupying it during World War II. After a brief return
to a democratic government when the war ended, the Communists staged a coup
d’état in 1948 and established one-party rule.
“When Communists took control of the country, they decided the middle class
needed to be eliminated,” Jara says, “and things became very difficult for
my parents, who opposed the Communist government.” In September 1949, the
secret police came to arrest her father at the family’s home, but Jara’s
six-year-old sister told them he was on a business trip, which was not true.
When he arrived home for lunch, her father missed the police by just ten
minutes, Jara recalls. Soon afterward he managed to secretly leave the
country, crossing the border into Austria. Jara, her mother and three
siblings escaped three months later, “basically with nothing.”
The family lived in the south of France for three and a half years until
they were able to get visas to immigrate to Canada. Jara came to the United
States at age twenty-four for a year of graduate study at a
Harvard-Radcliffe business school program, where she met her husband. “I had
lived under three Czech Republics, the French government and the Canadian
government,” she says. “So I had become very interested in how governments
worked.”
That interest in governments has been a focus of hers ever since. Jara
joined the League of Women Voters when living in a suburb of Philadelphia
and took part in a study of local property taxes, and she has been a member
of the Greenwich League since moving here in 1969. One of her early
responsibilities, Jara recalls, was to hire a babysitter to watch members’
young children, including her three, in her Old Greenwich basement. “It was
not a particularly glamorous assignment,” she says, laughing.
As Jara’s children grew older, she became more deeply involved in the
League. She was elected president of the Greenwich chapter in 1980, when she
and another member created the first Voters Guide, now an annual fixture.
She then was elected to the state LWV board and chaired a study on national
security. It included a four-day conference in Wingspread, Wisconsin, where
high-level experts, such as Condoleezza Rice, spoke about nuclear weapons
and disarmament.
“That study made me realize that I really wanted to concentrate on this
volunteer involvement,” Jara says. “I found that I had opportunities to
participate in so many different things that gave me access to much more
interesting endeavors than I ever would have had in the kind of paid job I’d
get.”
After working on a League study of the town’s Board of Estimate and
Taxation, Jara decided to run for the board and served on it from 1995 to
2005. “I felt I knew how the budget process worked, and I would know how to
apply the results of the study and improve the process,” she says. “One of
our discoveries was that the public input came too late, so we pushed for
much earlier and more frequent input.”
Jara was state president of the League from 2005 to 2010 and currently is
vice president for voter services for the Greenwich League, a job that
includes organizing voter registration drives and debates for the 2011
election.
“I’ve moderated a lot of debates, and I love doing that,” she says. “I think
debates are very important because we need to have a more educated
electorate. Too many people, even if they vote, do not know why and what.
It’s particularly interesting to me how people may know about the federal
government, but they know very little about how our local government and
state government works.”
Jara, who got the right to vote in 1964 when she became a citizen, says
she’s come to understand what democracy means through her League
involvement. She holds strong views on voter turnout, which is around 40
percent or so in local elections.
“I don’t know why so few people vote in elections for local officials,” she
says, pointing out that there are 34,000 registered voters in Greenwich.
“But when you vote in the state election, you are one of 2,500,000 voters.
It gets astronomical when you talk about national elections.
“Through my League involvement, I have really come to espouse the American
ideals from the bottom of my heart,” Jara says. “I think it’s important that
we do better in encouraging people to vote and believe that if they vote,
it’s going to be counted. Basically the system does work. That’s what I
believe, and it’s a result of my League experience.”
Kay Maxwell
In 1983, Kay Maxwell joined the Greenwich League when she and her family
moved here from a town in Virginia, where she had been president of the
local League. A government and international relations major in college, Kay
says the organization provided a way to pursue those interests.
“When I first joined the League, most women weren’t working outside the
home,” she recalls. “It offered an opportunity to debate and discuss issues
and was intellectually stimulating.” Kay served on the Greenwich board for
thirteen years and became involved with the Connecticut League while
chairing its annual symposium on international relations at Yale. She became
state president in 1989.
After her four-year term was up, Kay says her work with the League led to a
job with the International Executive Service Corps organizing public
administration programs in the former Soviet Union. “I helped local and
regional-level government officials, who,” she says, “all of a sudden when
the walls came down had no clue as to how they were supposed to operate.”
Her League experience also enabled her to go to places like Thailand, Korea,
Mongolia, the West Bank and Rwanda working on women’s political
participation as part of the State Department’s International Speakers and
Citizens Connect programs. “The League’s given me an opportunity to meet
women from around the world under really difficult circumstances, reminding
me how lucky we are here,” she says. “Not that we don’t have a long way to
go.”
After serving as national budget chair and first vice president of the
national League of Women Voters, Kay was elected president in 2002. She kept
her service corps job for a year but found it too difficult to do both jobs.
“I gave up the paying job for the nonpaying one,” Kay comments. “But it was
a fabulous experience that I wouldn’t have traded for anything.”
A main goal as national president was to ensure that the Help America Vote
Act, which Congress passed in response to the contested 2000 presidential
election between George W. Bush and Al Gore, was implemented. The act
required standardized voting machines, poll worker training and other
reforms to protect voters’ rights.
“Before the 2004 election, I toured eight swing states, doing radio,
television, meeting with groups, delivering information about what voters
needed to know,” she says. “Over my four years as president, I went to
something like twenty-five states.”
Sponsoring presidential debates had once been a prominent part of the job,
but that changed in 1988, Kay observes, “when the national president said
that the League refused to continue being a party to hoodwinking the
American public into thinking this was still being run by the League.”
Former chairmen of the Republican and Democratic parties now run
presidential debates; the League continues to sponsor state and local
debates.
Today Kay Maxwell is executive director of the World Affairs Forum in
Stamford, a nonprofit organization that sponsors prominent speakers on
international relations and America’s role in the world. Earlier this year
she completed a two-year term as chairman of Planned Parenthood of Southern
New England. She continues her League work by moderating political debates
and public forums, such as one on health care last year.
“The League has impacted me in so many different ways,” Kay states. “First
of all, I learned how to organize and run meetings. It’s always surprising
when you go to another organization’s meetings where people don’t know the
basics. It led to a job. It enabled me to be engaged. I love government and
politics. The League gave me an opportunity to be involved in both in a
nonpartisan way.”
Cheryl Dunson
Soon after Cheryl Dunson and her husband moved here in 1992, she saw a
notice in the paper about a walk in the Mianus River Gorge Preserve being
sponsored by the Greenwich League. She recalls thinking, “I don’t know
anyone in town, it’s not far from where I live, I’ll check it out.” The walk
was part of a study of land use that the League was doing in advance of the
town adopting a new plan on conservation and development.
“I was really impressed with the group. I could tell they were more
interested in issues than in what they wore, and I found that very
appealing,” Cheryl says, so she decided to join both the League and the
study. “I learned so much about town planning, urban planning and in
particular, the importance of protecting the water supply and the land
around the source of the water,” she says. “Through the League, I developed
a passion. I kept going to meetings. I ended up chairing the land use study,
and the rest is history.”
After the study was completed, Cheryl headed a campaign to explain to
Greenwich residents what a land use plan was and what it meant for them. “We
made presentations to community groups, and people started saying, ‘Wait a
minute, I have strong views about whether we should widen sidewalks or have
more businesses. I should have a voice.’ ”
Cheryl says the town started holding community meetings and added an
implementation component as a result of the League’s activities. “The plan
would say we should preserve open space,” she explains, “but it wouldn’t say
how much was supposed to be preserved or who was supposed to preserve it. We
said, ‘Once you have your plan, you have to be sure you are acting on it,
not just put it on a shelf.’ ”
“It’s the way we work every time,” she observes. “We educate ourselves on an
issue, we establish a position, we educate the public, then weigh in where
decisions are made. I have become addicted to the process. It’s such a
thoroughly intellectual, stimulating environment to be engaged in.”
She went on to serve as president of the Greenwich League from 1996 to 1999,
then continued as the organization’s land use specialist. In that role she
enlisted support for three major land acquisitions in town: the Pomerance
property, Calf’s Island and Treetops.
Cheryl says the League changed her life. “I was never interested in
government or politics beforehand. I thought that politics was corrupt. I
thought some of the issues were too complex for me to understand. I thought
that public officials were completely self-serving.
“My husband’s an attorney, and whenever we’d go to a firm function and there
was a conversation about politics,” she recalls, “I would extricate myself.”
In 2005 Cheryl got involved on water use issues at the state level at a time
when water supply companies in other states had started selling off land
that had been acquired to protect water quality. By lobbying Hartford
legislators, she helped get a law passed that eliminated the financial
incentives for Connecticut water companies to sell off that type of land. “I
thought, ‘Oh, I like this,’ and I joined the state board as its head of
advocacy. We had a team that focused on different areas: transportation,
water, reproductive rights and so on.” That role led to being president of
the Connecticut League for the past year and a half.
The League of Women Voters has given Cheryl a sense of empowerment that
she’d never had before, she says. “I definitely felt powerless before when
it came to political issues. I am a different person in the way I view the
world. I really do believe an individual can make a difference because I’ve
lived it.”
----------------
League of Women Voters
Try to Protect Water Quality and Supplies
Issue draws 150 to public forum.
By Kevin James Moore | January 21, 2011 | Greenwich Patch
Nearly 150 people attended a League of Women Voters of Greenwich
forum “Greenwich Water: Scarce and Precious” that focused on the town’s
water quality and conservation, which was held at Town Hall Wednesday night.
President of the League of Voters of Greenwich (LWVG) Cyndy Anderson said,
“water is something we take for granted, but there are real issues around
it.” The idea to have the open public panel presentation came from the
LWVG’s members who said they wanted to follow their own ethic to provide
direct first-hand information to residents so they can make up their own
minds concerning Greenwich’s water issues.
Anderson explained, “A number of our members were very concerned with water
issues in town, and this ignited their attention and their passion to create
the presentation.” The evening's panelists were David Medd, manager of
supply operations at Aquarion Water Co., Caroline Calderone Baisley,
director of the Greenwich Health Department, and Denise Savageau, director
of the town's Conservation Commission, who each gave a 15-minute
presentation.
The attendees listened as panel moderator Cheryl Dunson, president of the
League of Women Voters of Connecticut, started the presentation explaining
why the LWVG hoste the program. “We are here to address issues surrounding
the quality and quantity of water in our town, and what we as residents can
do, and what actions we can take to ensure we have an ample supply and high
quality of drinking water,” said Dunson, a Greenwich resident.
Meline Dickson, a member of LWVG, gave a resident's perspective and told a
story about a Greenwich family who used three private wells and town water,
to irrigate watered their 10-acre property. Their summer water bill exceeded
$4,000. Even though their gardens were beautiful, their neighbors well were
tapped dry. Dickson proposed the question, “Should the town be regulating
this finite resource?”
Medd, whose Aquarion Water Co. provides water to more than 16,000 Greenwich
residents and businesses, gave a history on how the town’s watersheds
progressed since the Putnam Dam was built off Lake Avenue in 1880. The
town’s watersheds now cover 36 square miles from all the reservoirs
combined. Greenwich gets 90 percent of its water supply from the town’s own
reservoirs with 10 percent coming from Stamford, explained Medd. For
Greenwich, the average daily demand is 15 million gallons of water, which is
drawn from the 3.2 billion gallons stored in the local reservoirs. “Over the
past 11 years there has been a 2 percent increase in the cost of water per
year,” said Medd. The cost covers maintenance, storage, and administrative
pay. He added, that in past 5 to 7 years water demand has slightly
diminished due to more efficient home appliances that use water.
Baisley discussed the town’s policy on water quality. “The municipal code is
to preserve the purity of all water sources and to prevent pollution,” said
Baisley. She outlined the process a resident must complete before drilling a
well.
“A person must obtain a permit for a private well, and verify the well is
properly located on the property, and that testing is conducted,” Baisley
said. Baisley said the town issues an average of 50 well permits a year.
Although, there is no restriction on the number of wells a person can drill,
which Baisley said was unfortunate, the town does request information from
the homeowner on why they are drilling a new well. The town also encourages
homeowners to consider installing storage tanks as an alternative. “(The
Town) tests for lead and arsenic, and eight percent of wells fail for lead
and believe it or not, arsenic (accounts for) 17 percent of the failures,”
said Baisley. To ensure water quality and quantity, Baisley recommended that
residents test their wells on a consistent basis. She added, residents
should report to the town when their wells run dry, even though it is not
required.
Savageau gave an overview on water supply. She stated that 65 percent of
Greenwich residents receive their water from the local watersheds with the
remaining 35 percent depending on private wells. The Greenwich water system
also supplies water to neighboring Port Chester, Rye, and Rye Brook in
Westchester County, explained Savageau. She said she wanted to clarify this
because during times of draught she frequently is asked why Greenwich is
supplying water to neighboring towns.
Savageau explained how last fall's uncanny fall draught left reservoirs
levels at 30 percent, slightly above the 28 percent level that would call
for water conservation.
Jack Stoecker, president of the Mianus Watershed Council, helped the LWVG
organize the presentation. “The LWVG became very enthusiastic about water
issues,” said Stoecker and he wanted to assist them.
At the end of the meeting the LWVG handed out an evaluation form to gauge
the public's interest concerning water and what future programs they should
pursue. The evaluation form can also be found on LWVG website: www.lwvg.org.
Dickson summed up the presentation best. “To protect our water quality and
quantity, we citizens may need to think differently and realize our choices
affect others.”
Written by Maggie
Caldwell, Editor
Greenwich Post
Wednesday, 24 November 2010 14:30
A stigma is often attached to the term affordable housing, one of
ghettoized neighborhoods and decrepit housing projects. However, at one
point in time, some of the most coveted property in Greenwich served as
the location for one of town’s earliest housing developments.
Shortly after World War II, Tod's Point, which had been which had
been left by its original owners to the Presbyterian Hospital in New
York, came up for consideration to be sold. A number of prominent
citizens concerned about the welfare of local veterans got together and
convinced the town to purchase the property. For a price tag of around
$565,000, the town bought the land and built the first affordable
housing development.
The property was rented to about 15 individuals and families who
together took responsibility for the upkeep of the property. They
planted gardens and kept up with the maintenance all while paying a rent
of about $260 a month. The last resident moved out in the early 1960s.
This is according to Nancy Brown, chairman of the Housing Task Force
and former director of Community Development in Greenwich. She and
Bernadette Settelmeyer, a commissioner of the Housing Authority and
member of the Housing Task Force, were the speakers at an educational
forum on affordable housing last Thursday sponsored by the Greenwich
League of Women Voters. The women spoke about the history of affordable
housing nationally and locally, and noted some of the challenges the
town faces to meet state requirements.
Affordable housing is defined generally as shelter where the total
members of a household make no more than 80% of the area median income
and are paying no more than 30% of their income to housing. This is
differentiated from workforce housing, which the Connecticut Housing
Authority (CHFA) defines for its tax credit program as “affordable
housing for low-and moderate-income wage or salaried workers in the
municipalities where they work,” and low income housing, which is
targeted at households whose income is below 80% of the area median
income.
The state sets a goal that each town should have at least 10% of its
housing as affordable. Greenwich has about 5% right now, a number that
fluctuates annually with new construction.
The Greenwich Housing Authority was established in 1946 as a
quasi-government agency created out of legislation from the state and
local government, but completely independent from the town. It controls
nearly 761 units in 15 properties, including home-ownership
condominiums, scattered-site housing and Parsonage Cottage. Initially,
its mission was to provide housing for World War II veterans.
Ms. Settelmeyer said the Greenwich Housing Authority is distinct from
any Connecticut agency, acting as an autonomous organization though its
commissioners are appointed by the selectmen. All of its capital and
operational funding comes from rents by the tenants and government
subsidies. Essentially it functions like a business, focusing on
advocacy, property management, government compliance and development.
“The obvious plus for the town is that we are a Greenwich entity,”
said Ms. Settelmeyer. “Unlike other non-profits or stand alone
for-profit groups, if we have a positive cash flow our incentive is to
put money back into housing in Greenwich. That is the reason it is so
important that the Greenwich Housing Authority and the town are in lock
step and understand what the town’s desires on what housing needs are.”
The community’s goals for affordable housing are laid out in the
town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD), a document updated
every 10 years by the Planning & Zoning Commission. It serves as an
advisory tool to determine the most desirable use of land and population
density and how the community wants the town to grow.
“Greenwich has placed a great deal of emphasis on retaining the
natural beauty of this area,” said Ms. Brown. “Trees are very precious
to us. Open space. I think that the POCD tries to give direction on how
we can maintain those values.”
That value system has been a large part of why Greenwich remains
below the state’s desired levels of affordable housing. Stamford, for
example, has met and exceeds the number of units required.
“We don’t want to be a mini-Stamford,” Ms. Brown said. “It’s great to
have it next door. It provides us with many services, but Greenwich in
the early 60s made some drastic changes when they created zoning
regulations that permitted the building of office buildings in town. It
was supposed to also address the housing needs at the time, but they did
not do it.”
The fact that the town doesn’t meet the state’s 10% threshold means
that developers who have their construction plans denied may come back
with a plan that includes affordable units. Overwhelmingly the state
courts rule in favor of the developers in these cases.
The POCD specifically recommends a housing task force to look at the
issues surrounding development and how the town may generate additional
housing. One of the challenges the task force faces is determining the
inventory of units that are being rented below-market rate. One landlady
in the audience said she provides such units but her properties aren’t
counted among those listed as affordable.
Ms. Settelmeyer said that some of these units might be eligible to
receive state subsidies, though a deed restriction might be required.
Greenwich is unique in that it provides no worker housing, though the
Housing Authority has worked with the town to build affordable housing
in areas with easy access to town buildings and downtown amenities.
One audience member said it should be a priority of the town to have
a certain percentage of housing be available to people such as teachers
and police officers who make below the town’s median income. Ms.
Settelmeyer said that is something to consider for the POCD, adding that
the idea of affordable housing usually starts with groups such a
churches who often advocate for the building of more units.
“The town is very concerned that we don’t turn over our authority to
the courts to decide how we want our community to grow,” Ms. Brown said,
adding that it is the biggest challenge striking the right balance
between the community’s desire and providing shelter for those of modest
means.
More information about affordable housing in town may be found at
Greenwichhousing.org.
Greenwich debates affordable housing
Frank MacEachern, Staff
Writer
Greenwich Time
Published: 10:28 p.m., Thursday, November
18, 2010
Greenwich is still undecided on what it wants do
with affordable housing, said a housing commissioner
Thursday during an information session.
"The train
has already left the station, and Greenwich is still
on the platform,"
Bernadette Settlemeyer, a member of the
Housing Authority of the Town of Greenwich.
"Greenwich is still trying to decide what it wants
in its Plan of Conservation and Development and
whether it should be affordable housing or not."
Settlemeyer was joined at the event --
"Affordable Housing 101" -- by
Nancy Brown, chairman of the Housing Task Force.
It was a committee recommended by the 2009 POCD to
study housing in town.
About three dozen people attended the hourlong
session in Town Hall.
Affordable housing in Greenwich is not just about
public housing projects for people on the lower
economic spectrum, said Settlemeyer; it's also about
ensuring that people who work in the town as police
officers, firefighters or store clerks can find a
place to live in Greenwich.
"Is it important for us to have people who work
in the stores that are Greenwich people, people that
teach in the school system who are Greenwich people,
people on our public service who are Greenwich
people -- that's an investment in the community,"
she said. "These people are active, they are
involved, they want to contribute to the town they
are vested in already, but if they are commuting to
Shelton or commuting out of town, they come it's a
job and leave."
"We have to continue to maintain a quality of
life that has made Greenwich such a fine place in
which to live, to work, to worship and raise a
family. We should and we can maintain our primarily
residential community with housing for its entire
diverse people," said Brown.
Joan Adams questioned why private homeowners like
herself who rent out units that are below-market
rates are not included in the town's affordable
housing stock.
"We don't get support and we are not
appreciated," she said.
Often it's because no one knows about those
landlords, said Settlemeyer.
"We can't find you guys," she said.
Board of Estimate and Taxation member
Leslie Tarkington said many organizations like
private schools and
Greenwich Hospital provide affordable housing
for their employees as a way to attract them to move
to Greenwich.
Connecticut encourages the state's 169
municipalities to have 10 percent of their housing
stock as affordable. Currently, Greenwich is at 5
percent while Stamford has 14.5 percent.
Although the state doesn't levy sanctions for not
hitting that mark, it does offer an incentive for
developers. Developers with a project that has
affordable housing units who are rejected by a
community's planning and zoning commission can
speedily move ahead with a lawsuit against the
planning body, said Settlemeyer. She said it enables
the developer to get court backing for its plans.
Staff Writer
Frank MacEachern can be reached at
frank.maceachern@scni.com or 203-625-4434
League of Women Voters: Greenwich ethics code must be modernized
Neil Vigdor, Staff Writer
Greenwich Time
Published: 09:45 p.m., Sunday, September 5,
2010
|
Republican legislators say state finances
are in a shaky position
Frank MacEachern, Staff
Writer, Greenwich Time
Published: 08:46 p.m., Wednesday, July 14,
2010
The state's precarious
financial position has led one state representative
from Greenwich to compare Connecticut to
debt-laden Greece.
"The place is in turmoil
because the numbers don't add up," state Sen. L.
Scott Frantz said about Greece during the annual
legislative picnic of the Greenwich chapter of the
League of Women Voters Wednesday. "They owe about
113 percent total debt to the gross domestic
product. We are at 87 percent."
Frantz was joined by his
fellow Republicans in the Greenwich delegation, Lile
Gibbons, Livvy Floren and Fred Camillo, as they
spoke to about a group of 40 League members and
others at a private home on 57 Clapboard Ridge Road.
Frantz said the state is
facing a serious debt problem, high personal and
businesses taxes and the decline in the state's
population that will see the state struggle to
balance its books in the coming years.
Floren, R-149th District,
who represents the backcountry and part of North
Stamford, touted her work in attracting new jobs to
both communities. She said she and First Selectman
Peter Tesei worked with Blue Sky Productions to
bring 300 jobs to northwest Greenwich.
In Stamford, she and new
Republican Mayor Michael Pavia helped bring the
corporate offices of Starwood Hotels to Stamford,
Floren said.
Fred Camillo, R-151st
District, said working across partisan lines can
achieve positive steps and pointed to his work on
the transportation committee.
He worked with the
Democratic co-chairman of the committee, Tony
Guerrera, in enabling towns to put seat belts in
school buses without raising taxes. Instead it will
be paid by increasing the registration fees on
suspended drivers' licenses.
Lile Gibbons, R-150th
District, also spoke of her work on legislative
committees and legislation, but spent some of her
time praising democracy.
"Being in the state
Legislature I am more impressed with our country and
our democracy than I ever was before. Democracy is
circuitous, it's slow. You take two steps forward,
you take three back ... but we don't take our
enemies out in the courtyard and shoot them, we
educate our women, we have a trial by jury, we have
a writ of habeus corpus, we have all the freedoms
that are guaranteed to us in the Bill of Rights.
Democracy really does work."
One attendee, Democratic
Town Committee chairman Frank Farricker, attempted
to ask a sharp-edged question.
"You have all made a
very dire case for what is facing the state of
Connecticut; so what is your responsibility?"
He was cut off by League
member Jara Burnett, who emceed the event.
"Let's ask factual
questions, let's be very nonpartisan," she said.
Farricker rephrased the
question and asked the Republican legislators what
it is like to work as the minority in Hartford.
The members said they
work well with their Democratic opponents but said
ideology takes over when the two parties squabble
over taxes and spending.
Camillo pointedly
replied to Farricker's question by stating
Democratic legislators are tightly controlled and
punished if they go against the party line.
"I can't tell you how
many times Democrats have come up to me during
sessions and tell me `you are right' yet they will
go back there and vote the other way because they
are afraid," Camillo said.
Farricker attempted
another sally.
"So you think the answer
to being in the minority is to elect more
Republicans?" Farricker asked.
"No, no, no," said
Burnett who jumped in again to cut the question off.
Staff Writer
Frank MacEachern can be reached at
frank.maceachern@scni.com or 203-625-4434.
|